![]() |
||||
|
Cygnus X1 GZG Full Thrust Dirtside II Stargrunt II Political Library Xenology SJG Ogre GW 40k Eldar Space Marines Tau Tyranid Witch Hunters WotC D & D Sygil Navigation SciFi Glossary |
Historical Perspectiveas printed in the Ogre/Ogre Miniatures rules. The tank-type vehicle, considered obsolete by the end of the 20th century, ruled the battlefields of the 21st. Several factors led to the reappearance of the mechanized warfare. The first was the development of biphase carbide armor (BPC). Stronger than any steel, it was also so light that even an air-cushion vehicle could carry several centimeters of protection. The equivalent of a megaton of TNT was needed to breach even that much BPC armor&emdash;which meant that, in practice, nothing less than a tactical nuclear device was likely to be effective. Infantry, which had for a time eclipsed the tank, declined in importance. Although an infantryman could carry and direct a tactical nuclear missile, he had to be extensively (and expensively) protected to survive the nuclear battlefield. Thus, the "powered suit" was developed. Four cm of BPC, jet-equipped, it could guard a man for about a week (in increasing discomfort) from shrapnel, background radiation, and bio-chem agents. However, the cost of equipping infantry reduced their value. They were still more flexible and maneuverable than armor, and now they were almost as fast &emdash;but they were no longer cheaper. Long-range nuclear missiles, which and been expected to make a mockery of "conventional" operations, likewise declined in value as jamming technology and laser counter-measures improved. Without satellite guidance, no missile could hit a less-than-city-sized target at more than 30km&emdash;and no combatant could keep a spy satellite operational for over an hour. Missiles big enough to carry jam-proof guidance systems were sitting ducks for the big laser batteries&emdash;for, although lasers had proved too temperamental and fragile for battlefield use, they were fine as permanent antiaircraft units. Thus, the tank-type vehicle&emdash;fast, heavily armed and armored, able to break through enemy positions and exploit disorganization&emdash;returned to wide use. And once again, planners fretted over priorities. More guns? More armor? More speed? Increase one, and lose on the others? Increase all, and build fewer units? Some interesting compromises appeared. The 21st-century infantry-man, especially with the later "heavy powered suit", was a tank in his own right, at least by 20th-century standards. The armed hovercraft or ground effect vehicle (GEV), equipped with multi-leaf spring skirts for broken ground, could attain speed of 120 kph on any decent terrain, and 150 on desert or water. Conventional tanks were slower but tougher. All fired tactical nuclear shells. The ultimate development of the tank-type weapon, though was the cybernetic attack vehicle. The original tanks had terrorized unsophisticated infantry. The cybertanks terrorized everyone, and with good reason. They were bigger (up to 50 meters), faster (hovercraft models proved too vulnerable, but atomic-powered treads moved standard units at 45 kph or better) and more heavily armed (some had firepower equal to an armor company). And tow to three meters of BPC armor made them nearly unstoppable. What made the cybertank horrifying, though was its literal inhumanity. No crew was carried; each unit was wholly computer-controlled. Although true mechanical intelligence had existed as early as 2010, and fully automated factories and military installations were in wide use by the middle of the century, the cybertanks were the earliest independent mobile units&emdash;the first true war "robots". Once the first cybertanks had proved their worth, the development was rapid. The great war machines aroused a terrified sort of fascination. Human warriors devoutly hoped never to confront them, and preferred to keep a respectful distance&emdash;like several kilometers&emdash;even from friendly ones. They were just too big. One fact, more than anything, points up the feeling that developed toward the cybertank. Unlike other war vehicles, they were never called "she". Friendly units of the speaker's acquaintance were "he"; others were "it". And the term "cybertank" was rarely used. People had another name for the big war machines&emdash;one drawn from the early Combine units and, before that, from dark myth. |
|||
|
CSS |
||||